|
Sustainability
After 9/11: Conversation with former State Legislator
who is a Business Person (October 17, 2001)
Five weeks after 9/11, Earth Foundation was fortunate to secure
consultation from a highly informed individual who was then a member
of the State Legislature. He shared the following information with
EF:
Using MAUI as an example for each of the Hawaiian Islands:
Realistic Constraints of Implementing for Maui a
Sustainability in Food & Energy Plan
He said he is interested in EF’s "significant" concept of helping Maui and the State of Hawaii to become more sustainable in food & energy. He commented that it would take a couple of years to
get it started on Maui. And, he significantly added that
it would require a substantial change in public policy and
in Maui’s (or any Hawaiian Island's) culture. He agreed
that Europe is far ahead of Hawaii in this.
He said it would take a DECADE to implement such a plan on Maui.
FOOD & AGRICULTURE
The former State Legislator stressed “Cost effectiveness”
when considering having Maui grow much of its own food supply. He
suggests that the most “cost effective” way would be
for Maui to identify a nice specific crop market and grow 80% to
90% of that particular crop and buy the remaining 20% or 10% of
the particular crop from somewhere else in the world. He lists “bananas”
as a good example of this with Maui buying 30% of bananas from outside
sources while growing 70% of its bananas on Maui. EF surmises that
“Cost effectiveness” means it is cheaper to buy and
ship many products to Maui than to grow them here. However, EF surmises
the most secure situation in this fragile global environment
is to grow as much as possible of Maui’s
food supply HERE on Maui.
He said it is difficult to grow “commodity crops” on
Maui: corn, beans, etc.
He said a “distribution system” on Maui for locally
grown food is essential, of course.
He said economists & engineers are all needed to make it work
to grow Maui’s own food.
IMPORTANT—The former State Legislator
said the University of Hawaii (“UH”) a few years ago
conducted a study analysis and concluded that for the entire
State of Hawaii to become self-sustaining in agriculture and food
production would require less than 6,000 acres. But EF has not
been able to find out the name of the study and who or what department
at UH conducted the study. EF would like very much to secure that
study. Please contact EF if you have information.
ENERGY & FUEL
He was very interested in our alternative energy & fuel concepts.
He said the challenge with alternatives to petroleum-produced electricity
is the necessity to prove the alternatives can meet P.U.C. regulations.
JOBS
He was interested in this. He liked the fact that EF would plan
for many construction and maintenance jobs, and not just farming-agricultural
worker jobs (i.e., back bending over planting and harvesting crops
type of work). He had no alternatives to EF’s for creating
more jobs except to have the island of Maui GROW and not be a stagnant
economy and thereby create more jobs. He was concerned that there
is “a large contingency” on Maui that is “anti-growth
which could stagnate the economy.” EF would differ with his
concept by suggesting that this EF plan could create significant
economic growth for Maui while not requiring more population nor
more construction of new hotels and luxury houses that Maui doesn’t
need.
He added that such a concept and plan would receive a lot of “it
can’t be done” by engineers, economists, and business
leaders who review a plan. They would point out the holes in the
plan, which would be GOOD because then the gaps could be filled
and the problems corrected. He suggested that for Maui to become
substantially more sustainable in food & energy would necessitate
a plan with its facts straight and its case solid so the advocates
of the plan would not be looked at “as crazy” when making
presentations.
AGRICULTURE FINANCIAL MODEL NEEDED
With that solid advice in mind and with EF’s significant
expertise in researching, preparing and writing extensive Financial
Models dealing with projects of substantial financial value,
EF sought consultation from UH. This was done because EF thought
what was really needed as the cornerstone in such a plan would be
an outstanding “Financial Model” to show the merits
of the financial realities of how an innovative Agriculture plan
would work for Maui and potentially for the State of Hawaii. But
in an early 2002 meeting with Andrew Hashimoto, the Dean
of the UH College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources,
EF was surprised to be told that Hawaii is one of only a
very few states in the U.S. that does not have a Financial Model
for its Agriculture statewide or for each of the islands.
A Financial Model gives skilled and sophisticated 5 year projections
of anticipated revenues, expenses, and gross and net revenues and
profit or loss for a particular project or business – on a
detailed basis with highly detailed, financial assumptions stated
for all categories of revenues and expenses. Without a Financial
Model it is significantly more difficult to make sophisticated projections
and analysis of Agriculture and food crops for the State and each
of the islands.
In the likely event that UH Manoa’s College of Tropical
Agriculture is successful in its efforts to secure the
needed crop data over the next several years from each island, then
perhaps by the year 2010 the first Financial Model could
be started. EF hopes that for the State of Hawaii and Maui’s
use and for better future planning of the State of Hawaii’s
and Maui’s Agriculture industries, that a sophisticated Financial
Model for Agriculture will be produced. EF would then like to be
able to help, individually or as part of a team, to assist in producing
a Financial Model for Agriculture.
In the interim, EF continues an education program to help residents and government leaders better
understand the benefits of more sustainable Agriculture & Energy for Maui and the State of Hawaii.
|